Abstract
SPECIFICATIONS may be the bane and boon of any project; they are, however absolutely necessary. If done correctly, they inform the contractor of exactly what, where and why the owner wants the contractor to work. They also leave the means and methods up to the contractor. When they cross these general rules, chaos reigns, and somebody pays dearly to correct the situation. This discussion will demonstrate some of the best and worst (?) possibilities of each, and how to avoid them as much as possible. Examples will be given of various agencies and organizations specifications, and how the author thinks they can be improved.
Subject
Costs,
Coating inspection,
Water,
Coatings,
Materials,
Specifications,
Applicators,
Inspectors,
Structures,
Linings,
Construction,
Contractors,
Paints
© 2000 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. This work is protected by both domestic and international copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2000
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.