This paper addresses the general rules and principles under federal, and select state law1 (California and Michigan) surrounding the use of brand name or “or equal” clauses in public procurement. Specifically, it focuses on the prohibitions or restrictions upon solicitation provisions that favor one contractor over another, or one product over another, through the use of a brand name or “or equal” provision in the solicitation.

Subject
Test methods, Coating inspection, Protective coatings, Coatings, Materials, Specifications, Manufacturing, Materials performance, Procurement, Operations management, Contractors, Concrete coatings, Lining
© 2007 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. This work is protected by both domestic and international copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2007
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.