With the most recent Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM)(1) that addresses pipeline integrity and indirect inspections, there is language that relates to Direct Current Voltage Gradient (DCVG) and Alternating Current Voltage Gradient (ACVG) surveys including certain criteria associated with what must be addressed after completing DCVG or ACVG surveys. While generally both DCVG and ACVG are categorized as having the ability to pinpoint indications of coating defects, there can be a major difference in the success of the chosen technique depending on the pipeline conditions. This paper will point out when and why to use either technique including what the criteria of percent IR and Decibel microvolt (dBμV) really mean when conducting these survey techniques.

Subject
Holidays, Electric current, Pipe surfaces, Voltage drops, Piping, Voltage, Pipelines, Coating surveys, AC voltage gradient, Equipment, Coating defects, Surveys, Soil
Keywords:
Direct, Alternating, ACVG, DCVG, Current, Voltage
© 2017 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2017
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.