Flow assurance issues are often as a result of scale forming on solid surfaces in components such as subsea safety control valves or in pipes. As such, understanding the scaling process and its inhibition at surfaces is incredibly important. A once through in-situ flow rig has been developed and initial results were reported in a previous paper1. The rig enables the mechanisms of both bulk precipitation and surface scaling to be assessed under different conditions while keeping the saturation ratio constant.

In this study the kinetics and mechanisms of CaCO3 growth are evaluated at different SR values and with Polyphosphinocarboxilic Acid (PPCA) inhibitors at 2ppm. Brines with different saturation ratios (SR) 10, 15, 25, 45 and 60 at 250C were tested. The residence time from mixing point to sample was shorter than the induction time for bulk precipitation and as a result there are no crystals in the bulk solution as the flow passes the sample. Dynamic conditions where SR and inhibitor presence were changed were tested. The results further supported the idea that surface scaling is not always as a result of pre-precipitated crystals in the bulk solution. Surface nucleation depends on the number of active nucleation sites, a factor influenced by change in SR while the growth rate and mechanisms of surface and bulk crystals at different SR values are affected differently with inhibitors addition.

Subject
Precipitation (solids), Nucleation, Bulk solution, Surfaces, Turbidity, Constants, Saturation ratio, Crystal growth, Corrosion inhibitors, Mixing, Scale, Brines, Scaling
Keywords:
CaCO3, scale, surface deposition, bulk precipitation, kinetics
© 2016 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2016
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.