Abstract
Today, several issues are coming together to make cathodic protection monitoring a more mission critical need than ever before. These include: the need for better efficiency in the deployment of human assets; mitigation not only measurement; increased scrutiny on how well the assets entrusted are being monitored and protected; and, the increased penetration of development into remote locations while the growing population is forcing infrastructure development needs more broadly and penetrating already developed areas.
Cathodic protection monitoring technology has come a long way from its manual beginning. Over the course of a few years, automated remote monitoring has increased in popularity as a viable solution for pipeline, energy and utility operators. With a variety of options available, it is critical for operators to be well-informed and understand which technologies are suitable for their pipelines. While it can be overwhelming to choose a network provider, decision makers must thoroughly examine their options and be aware of advancements in cathodic protection remote monitoring. Understanding needs for security, observing pipe-to-soil requirements, and maintaining awareness of potential A/C interference are key areas that an operator should evaluate when selecting an automated cathodic protection system.
