Steam-side oxidation and the resultant exfoliation of iron-based scales cause unplanned shutdowns at coal-fired power generation facilities. Exfoliation mitigation is currently limited to frequent unit cycling to minimize the volume of exfoliated scale and upgrading a plant with a “blow down” system. This paper discusses the rate of steam-side oxidation on Type 304H stainless steel (304H) tube after shot peening the internal surface with commercially available techniques.

Shot peening the ID of Type 304H austenitic stainless steel superheater tubes has been shown to improve the overall oxidation resistance in steam. Decreasing the oxidation rate directly impacts the exfoliation rate. The adherent spinel scales are thinner and more robust than non-shot peened tubes of the same alloy. Most of the improved oxidation resistance can be attributed to the presence of a spinel oxide layer combined with a continuous chromia layer formed near the steam-touched surfaces. The presence of a continuous chromia layer greatly reduces the outward diffusion of iron and minimizes the formation of iron-based scales that exfoliate.

This work showed that a uniform cold-worker layer along the tube ID has a profound effect on oxidation resistance. Incomplete coverage allows oxidation to proceed in the non-hardened regions at a rate comparable to the oxidation rate on unpeened Type 304H.

Subject
Materials, Chromia, Tubes, Oxide layers, Oxide scales, Oxide surfaces, Scale, Stainless steel, Steam, Shot peening, Residual stress, Oxidation, Samples
Keywords:
Shot peening, shot blasted, steam, oxidation resistance, Type 304H, austenitic, exfoliation, superheater, SA213
© 2011 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2011
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.