This paper presents an overview of the factors involved in the selection of an active souring management solution for the Mars field, at which waterflood operations are due to commence in March 2004. It is well documented that the majority of similar seawater injection applications have experienced increased down-hole sulfate-reducing bacteria activity and the reservoir souring and H2S control difficulties associated with this. The Mars field was initially commissioned in 1996 with non-NACE MR0175 compliant materials used for well tubing and casing. Following detailed reservoir modeling, and HSE Risk Assessment, a plan was developed to change-out all production tubing to NACE materials, and a 100 % redundant H2S monitoring system was installed. However, replacement of production casing materials was cost prohibitive so a plan was developed to mitigate the predicted levels of souring by the use of an active souring control approach. Investigation into the various alternatives available, including sulfate removal membranes, biocide treatment and nitrate or nitrite injection, has determined that nitrate injection is likely to be the most effective souring prevention tool.

Subject
Test methods, Water, Materials, Bacterial growth, Nitrites, Sulfates, Reservoir souring, Nitrate injection, Seawater, Reservoirs, Souring, Nitrates, Biocides
Keywords:
Nitrate, Nitrite, Prevention, Souring, Srb, Waterflood
© 2004 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2004
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.