Nine higher hardenability low alloy steels were evaluated for potential application as hydrogen sulfide resistant oil country tubulars. The hardenability of the steels was measured using dilatometry to obtain continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagrams. Sulfide stress cracking (SSC) resistance of the steels was determined by the double cantilever beam (DCB) test method which measures a crack arrest fracture toughness, KIssc.

Two modified AISI 4130 steels containing 0.75% Mo-0.02% Nb and 1.0% Ni-0.75% Mo-0.02% Nb, and a 0.20% C-2.25% Cr-1.0% Mo steel were evaluated for application as coupling stock for C-90 and C-10 casing pipe. These steels were cooled to simulate the water quenching of pipe with a wall thickness of 25 mm or 63 mm (1 in. or 2.5 in.). The Ni-Mo-Nb modified 4.130 steel had the best SSC resistance, followed by the 2.25% Cr-1% Mb and modified 4130 steels, whose relative ranking depended on the cooling rate.

Another six 0.4% C-Cr-Mo or Cr-Ni-Mo steels were evaluated for possible application as bainitic, air cooled and tempered 90 ksi grade casing pipe. These steels were cooled to simulate the normalizing of pipe with a wall thickness of 19 mm (0.75 in.). All six of the 0.4% C steel were fully bainitic on cooling and had good SSC resistance. A 0.5% Mn steel had a coarser microstructure and lower SSC resistance than the other steels which contained 1.0% Mn. Addition of 0.03% Nb slightly raised SSC resistance. Increasing chromium content from 1% to 1.5%, or nickel content from zero to one percent did not significantly affect SSC resistance.

Subject
Water, Piping, Microstructure, Couplings, Manganese, Wall thickness, Steel, Nickel, Sulfide stress cracking, Hardness, Tempering, Quenching and tempering, Yield strength
© 1982 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
1982
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.