Abstract
Test specimens of various aluminum alloys common to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) systems or proposed for use in DoD systems were identically prepared and exposed under bare uncoated conditions in chamber based laboratory accelerated corrosion test methods to assess their relative susceptibilities to general corrosion attack. The methods used were ASTM B 117 neutral salt fog (NSF) and General Motors Standard 9540P (GM 9540P) cyclic accelerated corrosion. The NSF specimens were compared at intervals of 18, 72, and 168 hours. The GM 9540P specimens were assessed at 1, 5, and 10 cycle intervals. The corrosion assessments were graphically obtained using flatbed scanning techniques.
Government work published by the Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP) with permission of the author(s). Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2009
GOV
You do not currently have access to this content.