Scouring pigging of oil and gas pipelines is used to maintain flow efficiency by abrading the inner surface to remove precipitates such as wax and scale. There has been uncertainty over whether pigging of corrosion resistant alloy pipelines used in sour service could adversely affect their resistance to localized corrosion and stress corrosion cracking (SCC). In this work, a novel environmental chamber was developed to enable scouring pigging to be simulated on pipeline steels while under tensile stress and exposed to deoxygenated brine. Using this configuration, representative pigging damage was reproduced on Type 316L stainless steel cladding with both ground and as-received finish prior to four-point bend testing in a range of environments. Under conditions in which the alloy is considered to be resistant to SCC, simulated pigging had no adverse effect on the resistance of the alloy to localized corrosion or cracking. Under more severe test conditions, in which the alloy is considered to be susceptible to SCC, specimens with an as-received surface experienced preferential pitting and cracking located at pigging scratches, whereas no such effect was observed for ground specimens. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements demonstrated that the abraded surface had a thinner passive film and a lower corrosion resistance than the as-received surface. However, this detrimental effect of surface abrasion, which is associated with the removal of the pickled and passivated surface, is taken into account by the conservatism of SCC test programs, in which ground specimens are typically included. These findings support the perspective that under normal operating conditions scouring pigging is not expected to increase the risk of pitting or SCC.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 April 2018
Research Article|
November 22 2017
Effect of Pigging Damage on Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking of Type 316L Stainless Steel Cladding Available to Purchase
J. Hesketh;
J. Hesketh
‡
*National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Hinds;
G. Hinds
*National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Morana
R. Morana
**BP Exploration Operating Company Limited, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, TW16 7LN, United Kingdom.
Search for other works by this author on:
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
© 2018, NACE International
2018
CORROSION (2018) 74 (4): 487–495.
Citation
J. Hesketh, G. Hinds, R. Morana; Effect of Pigging Damage on Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking of Type 316L Stainless Steel Cladding. CORROSION 1 April 2018; 74 (4): 487–495. https://doi.org/10.5006/2621
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Suggested Reading
Effect of Pigging Damage on Sulfide Stress Corrosion Cracking of Corrosion Resistant Alloys
CORROSION (October,2015)
Shale Gas Production Pipeline Failure – Case Study
CONF_MAR2024