Corrosion protection of Mg and its alloys remains a challenge hindering widespread application. The propensity for Mg alloy AZ31B-H24 (Mg-3Al-1Zn) to be protected via sacrificial anodic based cathodic protection was evaluated. Potentiostatic polarization of AZ31B-H24 in 0.6 M NaCl and 0.1 M MgCl2 revealed that a wide range of potentials for practical or kinetic-based sacrificial cathodic protection is possible for Mg alloys but a practical range of potentials for substantial cathodic protection in 0.1 M TRIS was not observed. In addition, residual corrosion rates at potentials cathodic to their open-circuit potential were greater than expectations from electrochemical mixed potential corrosion theory interpreted to be a result of the negative difference effect. Zero resistance ammeter (ZRA) testing was performed on couples of AZ31B-H24 to commercially pure (CP) Mg and Mg alloy WE43B-T5 (Mg-4Y-3RE) to validate the range of protection for AZ31B-H24 and to evaluate their suitability for the protection of AZ31B-H24. Gravimetric mass loss of AZ31B-H24 from ZRA coupled samples revealed only a 2× to 12× decrease in anodic charge density compared to that at open-circuit potential. Coupled WE43B possessed a lower self-corrosion fraction than coupled CP Mg because it possesses a larger potential difference between its open-circuit potential and galvanic couple potential. Anode-cathode polarity reversal was not observed for couples of AZ31B-H24 to CP Mg and WE43B, but further ZRA testing did reveal polarity reversal of laser surface modified AZ31B-H24 coupled to base AZ31B-H24.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 May 2017
Research Article|
February 16 2017
Evaluation of the Potential Range for Sacrificial Mg Anodes for the Cathodic Protection of Mg Alloy AZ31B-H24
T.W. Cain;
T.W. Cain
‡
*Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
M.A. Melia;
M.A. Melia
*Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Search for other works by this author on:
J.M. Fitz-Gerald;
J.M. Fitz-Gerald
*Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Search for other works by this author on:
J.R. Scully
J.R. Scully
*Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Search for other works by this author on:
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Received:
December 07 2016
Revision Received:
February 16 2017
Accepted:
February 16 2017
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
© 2017, NACE International
2017
CORROSION (2017) 73 (5): 544–562.
Article history
Received:
December 07 2016
Revision Received:
February 16 2017
Accepted:
February 16 2017
Citation
T.W. Cain, M.A. Melia, J.M. Fitz-Gerald, J.R. Scully; Evaluation of the Potential Range for Sacrificial Mg Anodes for the Cathodic Protection of Mg Alloy AZ31B-H24. CORROSION 1 May 2017; 73 (5): 544–562. https://doi.org/10.5006/2356
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Suggested Reading
Magnesium and Magnesium Oxide Primer on AA2024-T351: Assessment of Field Performance
CORROSION (July,2017)
Electrochemical Diagnostic Cycle Testing of Magnesium and Magnesium Oxide-Pigmented Primers on AA2024-T351
CORROSION (August,2017)
Behavior of Magnesium-Rich Primers on AA2024-T3
CORROSION (May,2011)
Revisiting Corrosion Protection Mechanisms of a Steel Surface by Damaged Zinc-Rich Paints
CORROSION (April,2019)