Pitting scan (PS) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques were used to evaluate the corrosion behavior of nanocrystalline (NC) samples and conventional Al 5083 (UNS A95083) in three solutions with different chloride concentrations. The PS obtained in 0.5 N sodium chloride (NaCl) and in 0.5 M sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) + 0.1 N NaCl indicated that pitting should occur in these solutions. These results were confirmed by EIS data that were recorded for up to 25 days. For exposure to 0.5 M Na2SO4 + 0.05 N NaCl the pitting (Epit) and protection (Eprot) potentials determined after exposure for 2 h suggested that pitting would not occur in this solution. However, the initial impedance spectra were indicative of pitting. Tests carried out after exposure for 2 days and 3 days showed passive behavior, but starting with exposure for 5 days, pitting was again indicated for all three samples. PS performed at the end of the EIS tests suggested that this result was due to the increase in corrosion potential (Ecorr) over the Eprot values recorded at the start of exposure. Evaluation of the samples exposed in the EIS tests showed that the pits were much smaller, but more numerous for Al 5083 after exposure to 0.5 N NaCl. Nitric acid mass loss tests (NAMLT) according to ASTM G 67 indicated that the NC samples were not susceptible to intergranular corrosion. Observation with the SEM showed intergranular corrosion for the conventional alloy, while a large number of roughly spherical holes were found for the two NC samples.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2006
Research Article|
February 01 2006
A Comparison of the Corrosion Behavior of Nanocrystalline and Conventional Al 5083 Samples Available to Purchase
E. Kus;
E. Kus
*Corrosion and Environmental Effects Laboratory (CEEL), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
**Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
Search for other works by this author on:
Z. Lee;
Z. Lee
**Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Nutt;
S. Nutt
**Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
Search for other works by this author on:
F. Mansfeld
F. Mansfeld
‡
*Corrosion and Environmental Effects Laboratory (CEEL), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
**Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0241.
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for other works by this author on:
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
NACE International
2006
CORROSION (2006) 62 (2): 152–161.
Citation
E. Kus, Z. Lee, S. Nutt, F. Mansfeld; A Comparison of the Corrosion Behavior of Nanocrystalline and Conventional Al 5083 Samples. CORROSION 1 February 2006; 62 (2): 152–161. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3278260
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Suggested Reading
Corrosion Behavior in Sodium Sulfate and Sodium Chloride Solutions of SiCp Reinforced Magnesium Alloy Metal Matrix Composites
CORROSION (April,2004)
Use of Friction Stir Processing to Eliminate Sensitization in an Al-Mg Alloy
CORROSION (June,2012)
Corrosion of High Entropy Alloys in Molten Salts
CONF_APR2018
Effects of Prior Corrosion and Stress in Corrosion Fatigue of Aluminum Alloy 7075-T6
CORROSION (June,2012)
Pigment-Derived Inhibitors for Aluminum Alloy 2024-T3
CORROSION (March,2000)