Cathodic disbonding, blistering, and current demand for cathodic protection were measured for nine commercial coatings for submerged steel structures. The ASTM-G8 standard test and a long-term test (2 years), simulating North Sea conditions, were used. The relevance of the ASTM-G8 test as a prequalification test was evaluated by comparing cathodic disbonding in the two tests. After 800 days in the long-term test, the correlation to ASTM-G8 was good. The correlation coefficient was 0.98. The current demand for cathodic protection increased when the coatings blistered. Examination of the blisters showed that they had cracked. After 2 years of testing, the current demand only had increased for the thin coatings (< 150 μm). The current demand for the thicker coatings (> 450 μm) had not increased, in spite of significant cathodic disbonding for some coatings. Coating breakdown factors, defined as the ratio between current demand for cathodic protection for the coated samples and samples of bare steel, were calculated. These factors were compared with the design values for cathodic protection in Det Norske Veritas (DNV) RP B401 and NORSOK M-CR-503. For all coatings, the coating breakdown rate was lower than the design values.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 2000
Research Article|
March 01 2000
Effects of Cathodic Disbonding and Blistering on Current Demand for Cathodic Protection of Coated Steel
O.Ø. Knudsen;
O.Ø. Knudsen
fn1-1_3287651
*Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Machine Design and Materials Technology, 7491 Trondheim,
Norway
.
Search for other works by this author on:
U. Steinsmo
U. Steinsmo
**SINTEF Materials Technology, 7465 Trondheim,
Norway
.
Search for other works by this author on:
Current address: SINTEF Materials Technology, 7465 Trondheim, Norway.
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
NACE International
2000
CORROSION (2000) 56 (3): 256–264.
Citation
O.Ø. Knudsen, U. Steinsmo; Effects of Cathodic Disbonding and Blistering on Current Demand for Cathodic Protection of Coated Steel. CORROSION 1 March 2000; 56 (3): 256–264. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3287651
Download citation file: