An analysis is made of errors arising in the calculation of corrosion rates by the three electrode polarization resistance method used commercially. It is demonstrated that taking the mean value of the rates measured at ± 10 mV polarizations significantly improves the accuracy. Based upon fundamental electrochemical principles, the commercial two electrode method is analyzed for errors in calculating the corrosion rate. When there is no difference in corrosion potential between the two electrodes, the error in calculating the corrosion rate is similar to the three electrode method. However, when a potential difference does exist between the two electrodes, the two electrode method predicts a “weighted” average corrosion rate within a few %.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 April 1980
Research Article|
April 01 1980
Analysis of Errors in Using the Two Electrode and Three Electrode Polarization Resistance Methods in Measuring Corrosion Rates
M. J. Danielson
M. J. Danielson
*Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
September 01 1979
Revision Received:
December 01 1979
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
© 1980 National Association of Corrosion Engineers
1980
CORROSION (1980) 36 (4): 174–178.
Article history
Received:
September 01 1979
Revision Received:
December 01 1979
Citation
M. J. Danielson; Analysis of Errors in Using the Two Electrode and Three Electrode Polarization Resistance Methods in Measuring Corrosion Rates. CORROSION 1 April 1980; 36 (4): 174–178. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-36.4.174
Download citation file: