The incentive and justification for this study was to provide a safe means of deaerating solutions. Deaeration is desirable for many polarization and other electrochemical measurements because the removal of oxygen simplifies data analysis by eliminating an extraneous redox system.1 Hydrogen gas is often favored for deaeration because in conjunction with a platinized platinum electrode, it provides a reversible hydrogen electrode with a stable, reproducible potential that serves as a check on the deaeration process. The well known dangers associated with the use of hydrogen gas can be minimized with proper precautions for containment and exhaustion, but the specialized equipment, ducts, and storage facilities for multiple installations can result in considerable expense, and do not entirely remove the danger of a hydrogen explosion. In this study, polarization curves obtained using argon and nitrogen gases for deaeration are compared with curves obtained using hydrogen gas.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1979
Research Article|
July 01 1979
A Comparison of Deaerating Gases for Electrochemical Tests
Monte s. Walker
Monte s. Walker
*Physical Chemistry Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan.
Search for other works by this author on:
Received:
October 01 1978
Revision Received:
February 01 1979
Online ISSN: 1938-159X
Print ISSN: 0010-9312
© 1979 National Association of Corrosion Engineers
1979
CORROSION (1979) 35 (7): 327–328.
Article history
Received:
October 01 1978
Revision Received:
February 01 1979
Citation
Robert L. Chance, Ronald G. Ceselli, Monte s. Walker; A Comparison of Deaerating Gases for Electrochemical Tests. CORROSION 1 July 1979; 35 (7): 327–328. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-35.7.327
Download citation file:
0
Views