Extreme sour wells presenting H2S partial pressures much higher than 10 bar are frequent in several Middle Eastern areas and such situation are not covered by ANSI NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156 environmental severity diagram. The Sulfide Stress Cracking resistance of OCTG grades is a major concern, especially for high strength material at 110 ksi SMYS. Material qualification program combining NACE TM0177 Method A (Uniaxial Tensile) and NACE TM0316 (Four-Point Bend) was performed to cover risk of Sulfide Stress Cracking (SSC). Additionally, hydrogen electrochemical permeation tests. Most of the tests were performed at 24°C and 15 bar H2S, which is approximately the maximum accessible pressure at that temperature before forming dense H2S phase. Work performed highlights that material qualifications according to ANSI NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156 may be not enough when material is used at much higher H2S partial pressures than 1 bar H2S. Indeed, electrochemical hydrogen permeation tests performed up to 15 bar H2S show the increase of hydrogen content and permeation fluxes with H2S partial pressure, which illustrates that 1 bar H2S does not correspond to a saturation situation for hydrogen uptake inside steels. It is recommended for such qualifications to use Four-Point Bend test method to limit the evolution of the applied stress due to the corrosion rate while allowing an efficient mitigation of this issue by an increase of the specimen thickness.

Subject
Test methods, Materials, Hydrogen permeation, Fluxes, Corrosion rate, Autoclaves, Partial pressures, Permeation, Stress, Heat, Sulfide stress cracking, Hydrogen, High temperature
Keywords:
High H2S pressure, SSC test methods, hydrogen electrochemical permeation
© 2023 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2023
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.