F22 carbon steel has been widely used in subsea field development due to enhanced mechanical properties. However, commonly used scale inhibitors have been shown to be very corrosive against F22, and therefore cannot be injected continuously subsea to control mineral scales. In this paper, inhibition performances of several scale inhibitor intermediates tested under subsea conditions for controlling CaCO3 and BaSO4 scales were presented, and several formulations containing tailored corrosion inhibition packages were evaluated. The corrosivity of those formulations against F22 was assessed using static immersion coupon corrosion tests. The test results revealed most of the formulations had corrosion rates against F22 above 40 mpy and only two of the formulations passed the criterion of <4 mpy. The most promising formulation was selected for deepwater qualification and was ultimately qualified for downhole chemical injection. The additional material compatibility testing data show this new product is compatible with various metals and elastomers/plastics.

Additionally, to study the compatibility between this new product and a commonly used corrosion inhibitor, scale inhibition performance of the product with and without a corrosion inhibitor was assessed, and high-pressure autoclave corrosion inhibition tests in the presence of the corrosion inhibitor were conducted with and without the new scale inhibitor.

Subject
Test methods, Inhibitor performance, Corrosion rate, Autoclaves, Scale inhibitors, Fluids, Metals, Scale formation, Corrosion inhibitors, Brines, Carbon steel, Corrosion coupons, Scaling
Keywords:
Corrosion Control, Flow Assurance, Low alloy Steel, Scale Control, Scale Inhibitor, Subsea
© 2023 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2023
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.