A cold-worked carbon steel pulsation dampener in glycol service failed catastrophically necessitating investigation of the underlying causes. This paper describes the methodology followed to determine the most probable root causes of the failure. In addition to more traditional metallurgical investigation approaches, a new fractographic approach (referred to as statistical fractography) from which fracture mechanics parameters are extracted from the statistical analysis of the fracture roughness was used.

Statistical fractography provides the fracture properties of the failed material as well as the local mechanical conditions driving crack growth. It revealed here that failure had occurred in three stages: (1) an internal explosion or similar event resulting in shell buckling, overloading the deformed wall (2) initiation and slow crack propagation likely due to an environmentally assisted cracking mechanism and (3) ultimate failure through the rapid growth of a through-wall crack separating the dampener in two parts.

In addition to the fractographic investigations, an initial series of slow strain rate mechanical tests were conducted in glycol bearing environments to understand the susceptibility of the material constituting the dampener to environmentally assisted cracking and controlling parameters. Whilst not conclusive at this stage, a susceptibility to EAC has been evidenced from the failure strain coming to support the scenario inferred from the fractographic analysis of the failed dampener.

Subject
Environmental cracking, Materials failure, Water, Materials, Walls, Crack initiation, Roughness, Fracture surfaces, Crack propagation, Mechanical failure, Glycol, Fracture, Fractography
Keywords:
Stress corrosion cracking, statistical fractography, cold work, glycol, failure analysis
© 2022 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP (OR NACE OR SSPC). Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2022
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.