Alloy 718 is commonly used in the upstream oil and gas industry for multiple applications that are exposed to wellbore fluids and seawater with cathodic protection (SWCP). The alloy is prone to a hydrogen-induced stress cracking (HISC) risk if the influencing factors are not carefully selected and designed.

The influence of strain rate on the threshold stress intensity factor, Kth was evaluated using two heats obtained from slow rising displacement (SRD) and constant load K tests. The results exhibited a wide variation in Kth values. The inferior heat exhibited more intergranular cracking compared with the more resistant heat, which exhibited slip band cracking. For both heats, the SRD tests resulted in Kth values that were lower than those from the constant K tests. Strain rate effect was also evident on the measured crack growth rate (CGR), with the CGR in the SRD tests being significantly greater than in the constant K tests for both heats. The sensitivity to the strain rate was evident in the fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) response, which increased with decreasing frequency and did not exhibit any evidence of a plateau even at low frequencies.

Further work is necessary to understand the differences between the processing and microstructural features of the heats that might be responsible for the widely different HISC responses.

Subject
Scanning electron microscopy, Crack growth, Fracture toughness, Stress intensity, Fracture surfaces, Crack propagation, Fatigue crack growth rate, Stress cracking, Crack length, Heat, Fasteners, Fatigue, Alloys
Keywords:
Precipitation hardened, nickel-based alloys, fracture toughness, fatigue crack growth rate, static crack growth rate, fracture mechanics, hydrogen-induced stress cracking, cathodic protection, rising displacement
© 2025 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. This work is protected by both domestic and international copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2025
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.