In order to determine the impact of biofouling challenges, remote areas rely on testing facilities causing issues with sample validity and a long wait time to obtain results. This case study examines a remote facility that utilized on-site microbial testing to determine the impact of biofouling on the operation of an in-plant lagoon system. Four sludge samples were collected: lagoon surface foam, bottom shell growth, bottom shell black mud, and a sludge-plugged strainer. The goal was to determine if biofouling was contributing to sludge accumulation in the lagoon. Samples were subjected to on-site qPCR testing to determine sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) counts. Another batch of samples from the same locations were transported to a testing facility to undergo similar tests.

Due to quick sample-to-results time availed by the access to testing, results were obtained in <5 days. Results point to a significant number of SRB in all samples (~106 to 107 counts/g) that indicate a contamination of the lagoon, which may be source of sludge. Results obtained from the testing facility largely agree with the remote facility testing for all samples. Additionally, the engineering team was able to rapidly devise a sludge treatment strategy to alleviate biofouling.

Subject
Biofouling, Test methods, Primers, Water, Solids, Drilling fluid, Inspection, Seawater, Sludge, Bacteria, Fouling, Samples, Sampling
Keywords:
biofouling, microbial diagnostic, qPCR, remote facility, MIC, fouling, sludge, cooling tower
© 2025 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. This work is protected by both domestic and international copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2025
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.