Steel surfaces are frequently cleaned by abrasive impact prior to application of protective coatings. The resulting surface profile creates complications when measuring the thickness of an applied coating using a coating thickness gage. The effect on gage measurements increases with profile depth and also depends on the design of the probe and the thickness of the coating. Various international standards propose different, and often times dissimilar, methods to correct for the effect of surface profile on dry film thickness (DFT) readings.

This study intends to analyze and compare different adjustments methods, including those provided in ASTM1 D7091 (1) and ISO2 19840 (2) to determine their accuracy and similarity. A number of different coating thickness gage models will be used to better determine the applicability of each method, and to determine how well the methods apply for varying instruments, probe designs, and measurement range capabilities.

Subject
Test methods, Steel surfaces, Coatings, Probes, Thickness measurement, Roughness, Tolerances, Deviation, Instrumentation, Substrate surfaces, Coating thickness, Dry film thickness, Surface profile
Keywords:
coating thickness, 1-point adjustment, surface profile adjustment, surface comparators, Bmr, surface profile, blast profile, dft, dry film thickness, paint thickness
© 2025 Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP). All rights reserved. This work is protected by both domestic and international copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of AMPP. Positions and opinions advanced in this work are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of AMPP. Responsibility for the content of the work lies solely with the author(s).
2025
Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP)
You do not currently have access to this content.